I hope you guys weren’t looking forward to anything particularly intellectual today. This week, I bring you Songs of the Pond Ecologist, a compilation album of my hit singles from this summer. Apparently I hum songs to myself all day while I’m working. They mostly all sound the same (e.g., “La la la hmmm hmmm hmm”), but there are subtle differences among them. For instance, “The pond is not warm” has a faster tempo and more intermittent sobbing. 😉 I’ll take recommendations for tracks for volume 2 in the comments, if you’re so inclined.
Tag Archives: pond
My field season has started, which means that I’m suddenly spending a lot of time playing outside. While I was mucking around in the pond today, it occurred to me that my wonderful blog audience might like to follow along from home. So, in addition to posting about cool parasite ecology literature and related interesting tidbits, I’m going to spice it up with some notes about my field adventures. (It’d be great to get some feedback about which post categories people like the best, so if you have a preference, please let me know!)
To kick off the field adventure stories, let’s start with something really exciting: MUSKRATS! Today, I scared the crap out of a muskrat, and it scared me too! I was sitting quite still in the pond for a while, thinking about the best way to set up my field equipment. I heard a little splish-splash behind me, and turned around to find a muskrat practically touching me! The muskrat retreated upstream, and I finished what I was doing. Then I moved further into the pond, and I waited for the muskrat to come back. It did return, and I took a few pictures before it disappeared. I’m so glad I brought my camera today!
Now, I should probably tell you why muskrats are so exciting from a parasite ecology prospective. Muskrats are one definitive host for echinostome trematodes, and echinostomes happen to be some of my favorite parasites. SO – this muskrat might be a good omen for cool parasite ecology to come!
Trematode Biomass = Beetle Biomass = True Bug Biomass = Odonate Biomass
One big interest in parasite ecology right now is the quantification of parasite biomass in ecosystems. Ecologists have spent a lot of time looking at energy flow through ecosystems and quantifying how much of the total biomass in ecosystems can be found in each trophic level and taxonomic group. Until recently though, no one had quantified parasite biomass. But since parasites eat a little bit of just about everyone, they might add up to a big chunk of the total biomass, right?
The initial work regarding parasite biomass in ecosystems came from three California estuaries. There are several cool papers that have already stemmed from that work, and if you’re interested, you should check out the publications from the UCSB Ecological Parasitology Lab. Lately, the Johnson Lab has been tackling the parasite biomass question in ponds by studying trematode parasites, specifically.
Remember when I said that parasites eat a little bit of everyone? Well, according to Preston et al. (2013), if you’re a first intermediate infected rams horn snail (genus Helisoma), you’re actually 25% trematode larvae, on average. That’s NUTS. That’s like a human having an entire leg made out of parasites. Because ~30% of snails were first intermediate trematode infected in ponds, roughly 2-4% of the total biomass for that snail species was actually trematode parasites. NEAT!
Overall, the dry trematode biomass in the ponds was ~0.1 g per meter squared. That was roughly equal to the dry biomass of beetles..and the dry biomass of odonate larvae (dragonflies and damselflies)…and the dry biomass of hemipterans. In other words, there were a lot of parasites! Preston et al. (2013) estimated that ~0.1 g of cercariae (just one trematode stage) would be produced per meter squared per summer. Like I mentioned in a previous post about how cercariae get neglected from inclusion in zooplankton studies, all those cercariae make a great food resource for hungry aquatic predators!
Ok, one last neat thing. Preston et al. (2013) found that there was a negative relationship between the size of the cercariae (which varies by trematode species) and the number of cercariae that were released by a snail within 24 hours. Preston et al. (2013) weren’t the first to discover this, but I still think it’s a very cool trematode example of evolutionary trade-offs between producing many offspring and big (high quality) offspring. If you’re going to produce relatively small cercariae, you can produce a lot of them. But if you want to produce big, energy rich cercariae, you can only crank out a few per day.
So far, we only have data for systems where aquatic trematodes (in snails) are a huge component of the parasite community. What ecosystem should we quantify parasite biomass in next?
Preston, D.L., S.A. Orlofske, J.P. Lambden, P.T.J. Johnson. 2013. Biomass and productivity of trematode parasites in pond ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology.